<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Other Stories &#187; kate summerscale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.otherstories.co.uk/tag/kate-summerscale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.otherstories.co.uk</link>
	<description>Books, Feminism, and Other Stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>2009&#8217;s Bestselling Books</title>
		<link>http://blog.otherstories.co.uk/2010/01/2009s-bestselling-books/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.otherstories.co.uk/2010/01/2009s-bestselling-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirsty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bestsellers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dan brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate summerscale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steig larsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephanie meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.otherstories.co.uk/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to do these charts fairly regularly, but have somewhat fallen out of the habit. However, since the list of Top 100 Bestselling Books in the UK for 2009 is being published, I thought it might be interesting to have a look at the Top 20.
1. The Lost Symbol &#8211; Dan Brown
2. Eclipse &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to do these charts fairly regularly, but have somewhat fallen out of the habit. However, since the list of Top 100 Bestselling Books in the UK for 2009 is being published, I thought it might be interesting to have a look at the Top 20.</p>
<p>1. <strong>The Lost Symbol</strong> &#8211; Dan Brown<br />
2. <strong>Eclipse</strong> &#8211; Stephanie Meyer<br />
3. <strong>New Moon</strong> &#8211; Stephanie Meyer<br />
4. <strong>Twilight</strong> &#8211; Stephanie Meyer<br />
5. <strong>Breaking Dawn</strong> &#8211; Stephanie Meyer (I&#8217;m beginning to sense a theme developing)<br />
6. <strong>Guinness World Records 2010</strong><br />
7. <strong>This Charming Man</strong> &#8211; Marian Keyes<br />
8. <strong>When Will There Be Good News?</strong> &#8211; Kate Atkinson<br />
9. <strong>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</strong> &#8211; Stieg Larsson<br />
10. <strong>Dreams From My Father</strong> &#8211; Barack Obama<br />
11. <strong>My Sister&#8217;s Keeper</strong> &#8211; Jodi Picoult<br />
12. <strong>The Time Traveller&#8217;s Wife</strong> &#8211; Audrey Niffenegger<br />
13. <strong>The Other Hand</strong> &#8211; Chris Cleave<br />
14. <strong>The Return</strong> &#8211; Victoria Hislop<br />
15. <strong>The Suspicions of Mr Whicher</strong> &#8211; Kate Summerscale<br />
16. <strong>The Secret Scripture</strong> &#8211; Sebasitan Barry<br />
17. <strong>The White Tiger</strong> &#8211; Aravind Adiga<br />
18. <strong>The Girl who Played with Fire</strong> &#8211; Stieg Larsson<br />
19. <strong>Twilight</strong> &#8211; Stephanie Meyer (presumably a different edition to the one at number 4)<br />
20. <strong>Ooh! What a Lovely Pair: Our Story</strong> &#8211; Ant McPartlin &#038; Declan Donnelly</p>
<p>So, no surprises really. Dan Brown is in at number one with a bullet, selling about 100,000 more copies than his nearest rival. I don&#8217;t know whether to laugh or cry myself. </p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the Twilight phenomenon. I tried to read the first one and nearly poked my own eyes out, but Eve at Vulpes Libris took one for the team and thus posted the brilliant <a href="http://vulpeslibris.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/why-i-hate-twilight/">Why I Hate Twilight</a>. The comments themselves are worth your reading time too. Lots of capital letters.</p>
<p>In fact, the only book I&#8217;ve read from this list is number 15, <strong>The Suspicions of Mr Whicher</strong>. I thought it was OK, but deeply flawed &#8211; do have a look at <a href="http://blog.otherstories.co.uk/2009/01/mr-whicher/">my year-old post</a> on it. </p>
<p>The Steig Larsson books have been provoking lots of interest, which much of it centering around whether the books are &#8220;feminist&#8221; or not. I do own the first book, though haven&#8217;t read more than a couple of chapters so far, but The F Word did have <a href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/reviews/2009/09/larrson_review">this article</a> arguing against the books having feminist credentials. Not having read them, I don&#8217;t know whether I agree, but this post is good food for thought at any rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.otherstories.co.uk/2010/01/2009s-bestselling-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher &#8211; Kate Summerscale (2008)</title>
		<link>http://blog.otherstories.co.uk/2009/01/mr-whicher/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.otherstories.co.uk/2009/01/mr-whicher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirsty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[book thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victorian history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate summerscale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victorian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministbookworm.wordpress.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have, it would appear, always been fascinated with the darker side of human nature. Whether it be the many people who, up until the late 19th century, took daytrips to lunatic asylums to gawk at the patients, or the fact that I worked in bookshops for four years and True Crime was the biggest-selling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have, it would appear, always been fascinated with the darker side of human nature. Whether it be the many people who, up until the late 19th century, took daytrips to lunatic asylums to gawk at the patients, or the fact that I worked in bookshops for four years and True Crime was the biggest-selling section the entire time, there is something about the macabre that just keeps pulling in the punters.</p>
<p>One of the most sensational news stories of 1860 was the gruesome murder of a three-year-old boy, Saville Kent, at his<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-33" title="whicher" src="http://feministbookworm.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/whicher.jpg?w=195" alt="whicher" width="170" height="263" /> home in Wiltshire. He was found in the outdoors privy suffocated, and with this throat cut. It was more or less immediately clear that the murderer must have been someone else in the house, either one of the Kent family, or one of their live-in servants. After some inept bumbling by the local police force, one of the relatively new London detectives was called in to help. The detective who was selected was Mr. Jonathan Whicher, who had enjoyed fast and heady success in the Met, and was trusted by those on high. He quickly decided that the culprit was the boy&#8217;s half-sister, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constance_Kent" target="_blank">Constance</a>. But how to prove it?</p>
<p><strong>The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher</strong> by Kate Summerscale wears a lot of hats: murder mystery, social history, biography of Mr. Whicher, survey of the fast-rising power of tabloid journalism. I couldn&#8217;t help thinking, though, that the book was ultimately a jack of all trades but master of none. It is indeed a very well written book, and the opinions and actions of the local and national press were among the most interesting aspects &#8211; no surprise when you consider that Summerscale was formerly the literary editor of The Daily Telegraph. I was frustrated by the section on sensation fiction, which the Kent murder undoubtedly inspired to some degree, but Summerscale seemed to suggest that without this case then sensation fiction would never have happened. I think that&#8217;s pushing it a bit, to be honest. And, <a href="http://blog.catherinepope.co.uk/2008/12/10/the-suspicions-of-mr-whicher/" target="_blank">as Catherine said in her review</a>, she seems not to have read <strong>Lady Audley&#8217;s Secret</strong> &#8211; to which she makes repeated reference &#8211; terribly closely.</p>
<p>The book won <a href="http://www.thesamueljohnsonprize.co.uk/" target="_blank">The BBC Four Samuel Johnson Prize for Non-Fiction</a> in 2008.  Not having read any of the books it was up against, I have no idea whether it really was the best of the bunch, but I couldn&#8217;t help feeling a little disappointed by a book which I had been looking forward to for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.otherstories.co.uk/2009/01/mr-whicher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
